The Fighting The War On Terrorism Politics Essay

The Fighting The warfare On Terrorism Politics EssayWeapons of Mass Destruction stand is a major concern for the fall(a) in States and other(a) countries around the world. The archives of appliances of tummy destructions goes all the way gumption to the Middle Ages and is still a major issue today. My predictions at this time for this issue is that if the get together States and other countries do not widen to take form to flummoxher and monitor those throng whom they believe are capable of committing acts of terrorism that a Terrorist group volition attack this unsophisticated if not other as they have peril to support their beliefs. I recommend that the United States criminal evaluator organization continue to take all measures to protect this country and continue to cover all threats as if they are real to ensure and protect this country from additional attacks or a major attack from a arm of atomic reactor destruction.Weapons of Mass destruction is defined as a weapon that can kill and bring monumental harm to a man-sized number of humans and other life forms and/or ca practice abundant damage to man-made structures, natural structures, or the biosphere in general. The more skilful terms refers to any chemic, biological, radiological, and atomic weapons (Weapon of, 2010, parity bit 1). The intention of this term goes screening to Cosmo Gordon Lang, an Archbishop of Canterbury, who prototypic used the term weapons of kettle of fish destruction in 1937 in reference to the aerial peltardment of Guernica, Spain.Lang (1937) states,Who can think at this beat time without a sickening of the heart of the appalling slaughter, suffering, the manifold harm brought by war to Spain and to China? Who can think without horror of what another widespread war would mean, waged as it would be with all the new weapons of mass destruction (Weapons of, 2010, para 2).During this time there were no atomic weapon, and the biological weapons were a lready being researched by Japan, and chemical weapons had been seen in wide use in dry land war I.The first recorded use of weapons of mass destruction goes back to the Middle Ages. When the rules of war fell into disregard, the target go from the enemys soldiers to his people. The weapon of choice against a civilian enemy became biological, then chemical, and nuclear, as soon as scientific advancement and technological takements made them accessible (Rebehn, 2003, para 1).The first noted weapon of mass destruction goes back to 430 B.C. when Leucippus and his pupil, Democritus are credited with postulating the theory of Atoms and Void. Since then there has been an estimate of lxxvii recorded building of mass destruction, attempts, disco precise of weapons of mass destruction, and attacks around the world. The first use of a weapon of mass destruction came with World War I. World War I bore witness to the first chemical weapons attacks of the 20th century.Research on biological warfare agents began after World War I and several nations continued research and development during the arctic War. The theories of Einstein and other eminent contributors to the 20th century physics provided the behind for the development of nuclear science. Research towards nuclear energy began in the 1930s. nuclear weapons were used during World War II, and nuclear deterrence played a major role during the Cold War. The nuclear munition race slowed in the early 1970s following the negotiation of the first control treaties (Briefing, 2005, para 4).During World War II the trope mass destruction came to be increasingly associated with aerial bombing and elementicularly, after August 6, 1945, with the atomic bomb (Oren and Solomon, 2006, pg 12). In the aftermath of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, a debate developed in Washington regarding the Statesns nuclear policy. Many atomic scientists expected the United States nuclear monopoly to be short lived scientist sought to avert a dangerous arms race with the Soviet Union by turning over Americas atomic weapons to an inter topic authority on the condition that future nuclear powers bequeath do the same.Treaties and agreement were developed to address weapons of mass destruction to get everyone themely to turn over weapons and prevent additional weapons from being made. The 1968 thermonuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) does not explicitly require states parties to adopt national carrying into action measures to give effects to the treaty. (Persbo and Woodard, 2005, pg 3). This treaty requires that states get to into nuclear safeguards agreements with the world(prenominal) Atomic nothing Agency also k immediatelyadaysn as the (IAEA), which has proclaim non-binding guidelines for national measures to protect nuclear materials and equipment from security breaches. The International Atomic Energy Agency verifies state compliance with their safeguards agreements primarily through material metho d of accounting measures (Persbo and Woodard, 2005, pg 3).Presend day concerns with weapons of mass destruction arose after the attacks on kinsfolk 11th. An even greater threat to U. S. and Western security is the potential for biological, chemical, and nuclear attacks. The United States is making alliances around the world, not just to track put through the pockets of Al Qaeda, but to identify those countries that are trying to acquire the materials to develop and construct such weapons of mass destruction (Simonsen and Spindlove, 2007, pg 508).After the attacks on the kinfolk 11th America was attacked within weeks with letters containing Anthrax spores being sent around the country killing American. American citizens were afraid to open their broadcast for fear that it may contain Anthrax. As a result of these attacks fountain President furnish believed that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq which caused America to go to war. The danger posed by weapons of mass destruction was the Bush administrations chief justification for invading Iraq. President George Bush declared a War on Terror after 9-11 and singled out Iraq as part of an axis of evil. (Simonsen and Spindlove, 2007, pg 509).The United States went to war and invaded Iraq to search for weapons of mass destruction in addition to finding Osama bin Laden. The United States was able to locate ibn Talal Hussein Hussein whom felt that he was ceaselessly at war with the United States and he was executed for his crimes against the United States. The United States continues to look for Osama bin Laden, the attractor of the Al Qaeda and mastermind behind the attacks on September 11th.Osama continues to peril the United States as sanitary as others with future attacks that can give to millions of people being killed. No weapon of mass destruction was not found and was reported by Iraq Survey Group to never represent in January 2004. Al Qaeda continues to grow and inspire globally is a m ajor problem.Al Qaeda, little known beforehand the September 11, 2001, attacks is now linked to al roughly every terrorist atrocity around the globe-rightly or wrongly- this is the most notorious movement of the late twentieth and early twenty-first that impart shape the lives of westerners over the coming decade (Simonsen and Spindlove, 2007, pg 510). Osama bin Laden continues to reside in seclusion and Al Qaeda continues to show signs that they plan to come out attacks against the West.Persbo and Woodard (2005) writes,The terrorist attacks on the United States on 11 September 2001 catalyzed a significant shift by certain states away from efforts to strengthen the multilateral weapon of mass destruction treaty regimes (through improved validation arrangements) towards a rather less intriguing (or eminently successful) agenda to improve national implementation of these treaties. While national compliance is essential for the success of these treaties, the future to strengthen the treaty verification systems has made it more difficult to assess the status of states national implementation measures (pg 2).My predictions are that Al Qaeda and the Taliban will continue to grow and use the United States resources to assist them with attack the United States as well as other countries. I think that these terrorist groups are in the United States now flying under the radar as they have done before which assist them with their attack. I think that they will not attack in the next few years, because they know that the United States is aware and taking all threats seriously and will wait until they feel that the United States guard is down. I also think that if they do attack that it will be on a larger scale injuring and killing more people, instead of attacking building. These groups will continue to increase their organizational skills and may seek to string out outside assistance from other races that support their cause.My recommendation to the criminal just ice practitioners is that they must continue to treat all threats as if they were real and apply and increase security measures to prevent additional attacks against this country as well as other countries in the world. The governments across the world must continue to work together to keep and protect their way of life and keep an eye on the treaties and agreements that they have put in place. Communication with each other is very important with ensuring everyone is on the same page and no one is in the dark, especially where the weapons of mass destruction are concerned. The United States should follow the jumper cable of other countries and make it a little more difficult for immigrants to enter the country and remain here. The government should continue to monitor the activity of the Al Qaeda and Taliban and any other terrorist groups, we should not make the same drift and believe that we will not be attacked again and expect the unforeseen to protect this country. An attac k of mass destruction does not only fix the target but also affects the entire world and we must always keep this in mind if we want to continue to live.In conclusion, Weapons of mass destruction consist of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear attacks. These weapons have been in globe since the Middle Ages and are still a major concern for the United States as well as others countries in the world. I predict that the terrorist groups will continue to grow and organize and will wait to attack on a much grander scales to support their cause. As stated earlier I recommend the criminal justices practitioners around the world need to continue to work together to assess for weapons of mass destruction and treat all threats as if they are going to occur,