Friday, March 22, 2019
Media and Violence Essay -- Social Issues, Aggression
IntroductionIn this essay I testament be analysing whether slight visual violence within the media would mean little violence on the streets. Firstly, I forget be questioning whether in that respect is a connection between the viewing of media violence and proceedingual performing upon it. To do this I leave behind study the usefulness of the diametrical methods employ to approach such as complex issue. To illustrate this I testament use examples of different media forms that seem to have been a catalyst for acts of violence. I will then attempt to come to a conclusion on whether less media violence could mean less acts of violence. DefineFirstly, to begin to analyse the media effects of violence bingle must define the term violence. The detail that in that respect ar several different levels of violence means that it will be difficult to define (Gauntlett, 2001). For example using abusive wording usher out been seen as an act of violent and aggression to some, but to others whitethorn not view it as actual violence as there has not been any form of physical contact. A researcher will also have to look at the context in which the act of violence is acted upon, for example a pillow fight and punching some are both forms of aggression, yet they are interpreted differently (Boyle, 2005). One course violence can be defined is an act when an individual on purpose uses aggressive behaviour physically or mentally to creates fear and constipation upon others. The media usually displays most acts of violence using a variety of mediums and different forms. In the 21st century there has been a technology blast whereby new and more complexes forms of media have emerged. There has been an increase in tightness and interaction amongst mediums such as the video game, television and mobile phones. For example, by usin... ...luencing discourtesy such as gross structural inequality, poverty, consumer culture and spring chicken delirium (Gauntlett, 2001 ). To pin point the media as the root cause of streets annoyance prevents society from dealing with the real issue. To conclude, even if the media had stopped or restrict crime being presented, crime would still exist in one form or another. The media is a powerful to for creating aware of crimes but can also cause ir sharp fear which could then lead to alienation of a particular group. It could then be questioned if the media should limit the amount of crime shown, however in this post modern era technology has hold out so advanced that visual crime will always be accessible. Therefore, it cannot be said that less crime in the media would mean less crime on the street as there is no rational link between the two and visual crime will always be present.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment